Comparison
Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0 Text to Video
Both run inside ALLAI, so you can compare them on the same prompt without two subscriptions. Here is what actually differs — the specs and the price per run, straight from the catalogue.
Side by side
| Seedance 2.0 | Wan 3.0 Text to Video | |
|---|---|---|
| Price with default settings | 264 coins with default settings | 80 coins with default settings |
| Aspect ratio | adaptive, 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 21:9 | auto, 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4 |
| Resolution | 480p, 720p | 480p, 720p, 1080p |
| model | fast, standard, mini | — |
What differs
- With default settings, Wan 3.0 Text to Video costs 80 coins against 264 for Seedance 2.0.
- Seedance 2.0 covers more aspect ratios — 7 against 6 for Wan 3.0 Text to Video.
Which one should you open first?
Seedance 2.0 and Wan 3.0 Text to Video split the measurable catalogue advantages shown here, so neither has a factual overall lead.
Run the same prompt and input through Seedance 2.0 and Wan 3.0 Text to Video; compare the actual outputs, then keep the model that fits your brief.
What is the same
Both run in the browser, need no API key, and publish to YouTube, TikTok and Pinterest from the same workspace.
FAQ
- Which is better, Seedance 2.0 or Wan 3.0 Text to Video?
- Neither wins outright — they differ in price, aspect ratios and quality tiers, which is what the table above lays out. Both are in ALLAI, so the honest answer is to run your prompt through each and keep the one you like.
- Can I use Seedance 2.0 and Wan 3.0 Text to Video in one place?
- Yes. ALLAI runs both, you pay per generation in coins and switch models in the composer without leaving the page.
- Do I need an API key for Seedance 2.0 or Wan 3.0 Text to Video?
- No. ALLAI runs the models for you — no keys, no install, no queue.